ETD - UIR

Electronic Thesis and Dissertation

  • Home
  • Information
  • News
  • Help
  • Librarian
  • Member Area
    Member Login Online Registration
  • Select Language :
    Arabic Bengali Brazilian Portuguese English Espanol German Indonesian Japanese Malay Persian Russian Thai Turkish Urdu

Search by :

ALL Author Subject NPM Advanced Search

Last search:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
Image of Pembatalan Perjanjian Damai Mengenai Nafkah Hadhanah yang Dilegalisasi Oleh Notaris (Studi Analisi Putusan Nomor 677/PDT.G/2019/PA.PDG)
Bookmark Share

Art Original

Pembatalan Perjanjian Damai Mengenai Nafkah Hadhanah yang Dilegalisasi Oleh Notaris (Studi Analisi Putusan Nomor 677/PDT.G/2019/PA.PDG)

M. Tegar Granada - Personal Name; R. Febrina Andarina Zaharnika - Personal Name;

The decision of the Padang Religious Court with case number 677/PDT.G/2019/PA.PDG in the case of living hadhanah with the case of ex-husbands having made a peace agreement which was legalized before a notary containing the maintenance of children and ex-husbands apparently did not comply the contents of the agreement and in this decision the agreement made by the parties was declared null and void by law by the panel of judges. Based on the above background, the following problem formulation is drawn: 1) What is the position of the judge's legal considerations at the Padang Religious Court in deciding the Hadhanah subsistence case in decision 677/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Pdg. 2) What is the strength of the proof of the peace agreement that has been legalized by a notary in court. The research method used in this research is the library research method. The analysis of Decision Number 677/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Pdg which was reviewed was based on books in the library and used the deductive conclusion method. The judge's decision at the Padang Religious Court in the Hadhanah subsistence case at decision 677/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Pdg stated that the agreement made by Surya Fajriani as the "plaintiff" with Rissaldi Zain as the "defendant" was null and void due to legal defects in the agreement such as the existence of an element of "coercion" on the part of the plaintiff SF and the defendant RZ was harmed in this agreement.


Availability
#
Ilmu Hukum (Fakultas Hukum) Hukum 346.01 Teg p
243595
Available but not for loan - ETD
Detail Information
Call Number
Hukum 346.01 Teg p
Language
Indonesia
NPM
161010372
Publisher
Ilmu Hukum : Universitas Islam Riau., 2023
Keyword(s)
Agreement
Legalize
Notary
Decision
Other Information
Petugas
Uthi Kurnia
Other version/related

No other version available

File Attachment
  • Please login to see this attachment
Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment

ETD - UIR
  • Information
  • Services
  • Librarian
  • Member Area

About Us

As a complete Library Management System, SLiMS (Senayan Library Management System) has many features that will help libraries and librarians to do their job easily and quickly. Follow this link to show some features provided by SLiMS.

Search

start it by typing one or more keywords for title, author or subject

Keep SLiMS Alive Want to Contribute?

© 2026 — Senayan Developer Community

Powered by SLiMS
Select the topic you are interested in
  • Computer Science, Information & General Works
  • Philosophy & Psychology
  • Religion
  • Social Sciences
  • Language
  • Pure Science
  • Applied Sciences
  • Art & Recreation
  • Literature
  • History & Geography
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Advanced Search
Where do you want to share?