Art Original

Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Penyimpanan Minuta Akta yang Ditinjau Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Atas Perubahan Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris pada Kantor Notaris di Pekanbaru

---

A notary is a public official who has the authority to issue authentic deeds and other powers as stipulated in Article 15 of the Notary Deed. For original documents made and witnessed by a notary, the notary is obliged to keep them as stipulated in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter b and I of Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Office of a Notary. However, the law does not regulate the procedures for storing minuta deeds so that they are prone to damage, loss and destruction. From the description above, the writer has several problem formulations in this thesis. The first is: What is the responsibility of a Notary in keeping Minuta Deeds at the Notary's office/PPAT in terms of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary? And second: What are the factors that hinder the safekeeping of the minutes of the deed? The method used by the author in writing this is a type of empirical legal research. Empirical legal research is based on the gap between existing legal norms and their implementation in society. The object of empirical research study is social facts. While the nature of this research is qualitative, namely a way of analyzing research results that produce analytical descriptive data, namely data that is stated in writing or orally as well as real behavior, which is researched and studied as a whole. From the results of this study are First: Minuta is the original notarial deed that must be kept by a notary. The obligation to keep the minutes of the deed as part of the Notary's protocol, is intended to maintain the authenticity of a deed by storing the deed in its original form, so that if there is forgery or misuse of the grosse, a copy, or a quote, it can be identified easily by matching it with the original. Second: Factors affecting the effectiveness of deed minuta a storage; problem with the rules in UUJN where it has not been explicitly determined regarding the Archive Retention Schedule, it is necessary to make new rules regarding the expiration date on UUJN/UUJN-P or use the expired rules in article 1967Civil Code and Article 78 of the Criminal Code. b; storage problem,then it is necessary to make new rules regarding more storagemodern and does not require a lot of space to useelectronic/digital storage.

---

Availability

Detail Information

Call Number

Hukum 333.3 Put t

Language

Indonesia

NPM

181010075

Publisher

Ilmu Hukum : Universitas Islam Riau., 2022

Keyword(s)

Accountability
Storage
Minutes of deed

Other Information

Petugas

Uthi Kurnia

Other version/related

File Attachment

Comments

---

You must be logged in to post a comment