ETD - UIR

Electronic Thesis and Dissertation

  • Home
  • Information
  • News
  • Help
  • Librarian
  • Member Area
    Member Login Online Registration
  • Select Language :
    Arabic Bengali Brazilian Portuguese English Espanol German Indonesian Japanese Malay Persian Russian Thai Turkish Urdu

Search by :

ALL Author Subject NPM Advanced Search

Last search:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
Image of Analisis Perbandingan Keekonomian Pergantian Pompa Srp Ke Esp Menggunakan Psc Cost Recovery dan Psc Gross Split pada Sumur XY
Bookmark Share

Art Original

Analisis Perbandingan Keekonomian Pergantian Pompa Srp Ke Esp Menggunakan Psc Cost Recovery dan Psc Gross Split pada Sumur XY

Aulia Suci Rahmadani - Personal Name; Muhammad Ariyon - Personal Name;

The decrease in oil production is caused by several factors, one of which is the small capacity of the pump to be used in producing wells that are still active, this is due to the characteristics of the fluid which is paraffin which causes the Sucker Rod Pump (SRP) not to work optimally, therefore the need for efficient pump replacement, namely with an Electrical submersible pump (ESP) which has a large production capacity and can work optimally. Because the motor of the ESP pump can generate heat which serves to reduce viscosity so that the fluid produced increases. This research will discuss a comparative analysis of the economics of changing SRP pumps to ESP using PSC Cost recovery and PSC Gross Split. The steps taken in this research start from data collection, economic calculations and sensitivity analysis to find out the comparison of the schemes of the two contracts. From the results of calculations that have been carried out, it shows that the PSC Gross split contract system is better than PSC Cost recovery in terms of contractor income, because the contractor's income for the PCS Gross split scheme is 612,71 M US$ and PSC Cost recovery is 42,140 M US$. Furthermore, the Gross split PSC economic indicator value, namely the NPV, showed a positive value of 525,85 M US$, which was greater than the NPV PSC Cost recovery of 24,128 M US$. The IRR value of the PSC Gross split scheme is 714,35%, while the PSC Cost recovery scheme is 34,31%. And the POT value for the Gross Split PSC scheme is 0,81 years, while the PSC Cost recovery scheme is 1,46 years. Based on the results of the calculations that have been carried out, it is found that the PSC Gross split contract at the change of SRP pumps to ESP has better results for the contractor compared to the PSC Cost recovery contract. The most influential parameters for the economic indicators in the two contracts are the price of oil and the amount of oil production.


Availability
#
Teknik Perminyakan (Fakultas Teknik) Perminyakan 622.3 Aul a
245570
Available but not for loan - ETD
Detail Information
Call Number
Perminyakan 622.3 Aul a
Language
Indonesia
NPM
173210704
Publisher
Teknik Perminyakan : Universitas Islam Riau., 2024
Keyword(s)
Geological Potential
Geology
Facies
Litofacies
Other Information
Petugas
Uthi Kurnia
Other version/related

No other version available

File Attachment
  • Please login to see this attachment
Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment

ETD - UIR
  • Information
  • Services
  • Librarian
  • Member Area

About Us

As a complete Library Management System, SLiMS (Senayan Library Management System) has many features that will help libraries and librarians to do their job easily and quickly. Follow this link to show some features provided by SLiMS.

Search

start it by typing one or more keywords for title, author or subject

Keep SLiMS Alive Want to Contribute?

© 2026 — Senayan Developer Community

Powered by SLiMS
Select the topic you are interested in
  • Computer Science, Information & General Works
  • Philosophy & Psychology
  • Religion
  • Social Sciences
  • Language
  • Pure Science
  • Applied Sciences
  • Art & Recreation
  • Literature
  • History & Geography
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Advanced Search
Where do you want to share?