Art Original
Analisis Perbandingan Keekonomian Pergantian Pompa Srp Ke Esp Menggunakan Psc Cost Recovery dan Psc Gross Split pada Sumur XY
The decrease in oil production is caused by several factors, one of which is the small capacity of the pump to be used in producing wells that are still active, this is due to the characteristics of the fluid which is paraffin which causes the Sucker Rod Pump (SRP) not to work optimally, therefore the need for efficient pump replacement, namely with an Electrical submersible pump (ESP) which has a large production capacity and can work optimally. Because the motor of the ESP pump can generate heat which serves to reduce viscosity so that the fluid produced increases. This research will discuss a comparative analysis of the economics of changing SRP pumps to ESP using PSC Cost recovery and PSC Gross Split. The steps taken in this research start from data collection, economic calculations and sensitivity analysis to find out the comparison of the schemes of the two contracts. From the results of calculations that have been carried out, it shows that the PSC Gross split contract system is better than PSC Cost recovery in terms of contractor income, because the contractor's income for the PCS Gross split scheme is 612,71 M US$ and PSC Cost recovery is 42,140 M US$. Furthermore, the Gross split PSC economic indicator value, namely the NPV, showed a positive value of 525,85 M US$, which was greater than the NPV PSC Cost recovery of 24,128 M US$. The IRR value of the PSC Gross split scheme is 714,35%, while the PSC Cost recovery scheme is 34,31%. And the POT value for the Gross Split PSC scheme is 0,81 years, while the PSC Cost recovery scheme is 1,46 years. Based on the results of the calculations that have been carried out, it is found that the PSC Gross split contract at the change of SRP pumps to ESP has better results for the contractor compared to the PSC Cost recovery contract. The most influential parameters for the economic indicators in the two contracts are the price of oil and the amount of oil production.
No other version available