Art Original

Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Akta Jual Beli Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris/ppat Yang Dinyatakan Batal Demi Hukum Oleh Pengadilan Negeri Sleman (studi Kasus Perkara Nomor 27/pdt. G/2018/pn.smn)

---

The author’s interest in vuridical review of the sale and purchase deed made by the PPAT Notary Public that was declared null and void by the Sleman District Court (Case Study Number : 27/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Smn) is because the sale and purchase deed is anauthentic deed made by general authority, but in this case the sale and purchase deed is an authentic deed made by general authority, but in this case the ale and purchase deed made by the PPAT Notary said by the judge is not an authentic deed but a deed that is null and void even thought the drafting has been made before the authorized official. The problem that the writer raises in this skripsi is what causes the sale and purchase deed made by a Notary/PPAT declared null and void by law in the Sleman District Court in case number 27/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Smn and how the legal considerations of the panel of judges regarding the deed of sale are declared null and void by law in case number 27/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Smn. Judging by type, this research is classified into normative research, which examines the verdict in case number 27/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Smn while judging from the nature of this research is descriptive, which aims to describe and provide clear and systematic details of the subject matter under study. From the results of the research conducted by the author, it can be seen the cause of the deed of sale is declared null and void by law in court number 27/Pdt.G/2018.PN.Smn because it does not meet objective requirements ( a specific thing and halal cause ) in the agreement as well as in making the deed of sale is based on acts against the law. Judges’s consideration of the sale and purchase deed which was declared null and void was based on the non-fulfillment of objective conditions in making the sale and purchase deed and the exixtence of a series of unlawful acts committed by Defendant I and Defendant II (Notary & PPAT) against the Plaintiffs in making and filling the deed of sale and purchase without the Plaintiff’s knowledge. According to the author, the Judges’s consideration has been based on an appropriate reason that is in accordance with the legal rules.

---

Availability

Detail Information

Call Number

Ilmu Hukum 346.0432 Tin Y

Language

Indonesia

NPM

161010134

Publisher

Ilmu Hukum : Universitas Islam Riau., 2020

Keyword(s)

-

Other Information

Petugas

Luthfi Pratama

Other version/related

File Attachment

Comments

---

You must be logged in to post a comment